
ST. PAUL, Minn. (AP) — A Minnesota jury awarded $65.5 million on Friday to a mother of three who claimed talcum products made by Johnson & Johnson exposed her to asbestos and contributed to her developing cancer in the lining of her lungs.
Jurors determined that plaintiff Anna Jean Houghton Carley, 37, should be compensated by Johnson & Johnson after using its baby powder throughout her childhood and later developing mesothelioma, an aggressive cancer caused primarily by exposure to the carcinogen asbestos.
Johnson & Johnson said it would appeal the verdict.
During a 13-day trial in Ramsey County District Court, Carley's legal team argued the pharmaceutical giant sold and marketed talc-based products to consumers despite knowing it can be contaminated with asbestos. Carley's lawyers also said her family was never warned about potential dangers while using the product on their child. The product was taken off shelves in the U.S. in 2020.
“This case was not about compensation only. It was about truth and accountability," Carley's attorney Ben Braly said.
Erik Haas, worldwide vice president of litigation for Johnson & Johnson, argued the company's baby powder is safe, does not contain asbestos and does not cause cancer. He expects an appellate court to reverse the decision.
The verdict is the latest development in a longstanding legal battle over claims that talc in Johnson’s Baby Powder and Shower to Shower body powder was connected to ovarian cancer and mesothelioma, which strikes the lungs and other organs. Johnson & Johnson stopped selling powder made with talc worldwide in 2023.
“These lawsuits are predicated on ‘junk science,’ refuted by decades of studies that demonstrate Johnson & Johnson’s Baby Powder is safe, does not contain asbestos and does not cause cancer,” Haas said in a statement after the verdict.
Earlier this month, a Los Angeles jury awarded $40 million to two women who claimed Johnson & Johnson's talcum powder caused their ovarian cancer. And in October, another California jury ordered the company to pay $966 million to the family of a woman who died of mesothelioma, claiming she developed the cancer because the baby powder she used was contaminated with asbestos.
LATEST POSTS
- 1
NASA’s Artemis II launch leaves Americans in awe: ‘We’re going to the frickin’ moon!’ - 2
Horror and fear in West Bank as Israel approves hanging Palestinians convicted of murdering Israelis - 3
What we know about the 'Stranger Things' spinoff — plus the one cast member who guessed it correctly - 4
Cases of norovirus are on the rise just in time for the holiday season - 5
WHO suspends medical evacuations from Gaza following death of contractor in 'security incident'
Picking the Right Doctor prescribed Medication Inclusion in Senior Protection.
Figure out How to Streamline Eco-friendliness in Your Volvo XC40
Amid growing bipartisan scrutiny of Pete Hegseth, Trump says he 'wouldn't have wanted … a second strike' on alleged Venezuelan drug boat survivors
Knesset sets special panel to fast-track Karhi’s communications reform
Shrapnel hits across central Israel, injuring several, causing property damage
Vote in favor of your Favored Kind of Scarf
'The best gift ever': Baby is born after the rarest of pregnancies, defying all odds
Virtual reality opens doors for older people to build closer connections in real life
25 Most Beautiful Villages in France You Can Actually Visit












